Report: Research into the genetic sequencing of COVID-19 relied on a People’s Liberation Army lab

The Daily Telegraph revealed that Red Army oversaw research into coronavirus research and a key laboratory conducted the “genetic sequencing” and “virus isolation.”

According to the Daily Telegraph, the China’s People’s Liberation Army has been involved with the research into the origins of the virus that is the cause of COVID-19. This research was co-funded by the Australian government and has been published in esteemed medical journals.
In an explosive revelation, a study co-funded by the Australian Research Council and the Chinese government, and trumpeted by The University of Sydney as helping to solve the puzzle of how COVID-19 transferred from animals to humans, relied on a key laboratory in an institute in the People’s Liberation Army’s Academy of Military Medical Sciences to conduct its “genetic sequencing” and “virus isolation”.
The director of the microbiology institute, Professor Wu-Chan Cao, who is thanked in the paper’s acknowledgments for his “substantial contribution”, has the rank of colonel and is a Wuhan Institute of Virology board member in a clear conflict of interest.
With the authors listed as:
Tommy Tsan-Yuk Lam, Marcus Ho-Hin Shum, Hua-Chen Zhu, Yi-Gang Tong, Xue-Bing Ni, Yun-Shi Liao, Wei Wei, William Yiu-Man Cheung, Wen-Juan Li, Lian-Feng Li, Gabriel M. Leung, Edward C. Holmes, Yan-Ling Hu & Yi Guan
The report also pointed out a key piece of information in the acknowledgements portion of the paper:
Acknowledgements We thank Prof. Wu-Chun Cao, Dr. Na Jia, Dr. Ya-Wei Zhang, Dr. Jia-Fu Jiang, Dr. Bao-Gui Jiang, and their team in State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing for their substantial contributions to this study, including coordinating among research parties, conducting virus isolation, qPCR and sequencing.
The Daily Telegraph reported that Prof. Wu-Chun Cao has the rank of colonel and is a Wuhan Institute of Virology board member in a clear conflict of interest.  In addition, it was reported that one of the study’s co-authors Yi-Gang Tong began working in the same PLA-run microbiology institute in 2005.
According to Research gate, both are at the Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, collaborating with the Academy of Military Medical Sciences.
Originally published on the NOQ Report

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Liberty Lexicon: Winning the argument with one word, Part I

Framing the argument is a critical aspect of the Individualist-Right winning the virtual cold war with the Collectivist-Left. We are in a war for the soul of the country and for freedom. At present it is a virtual cold war, with the Left is on the offensive using their inherent collectivist mindset to their advantage to try to set the terms of debate. It is critically important to recognize that in every conflict one side will develop new tactics and weapons that will be countered and adopted by the other in order to maintain parity. Such is the case with our present situation with the Collectivist-Left using certain words to their advantage as the weapons of the virtual war. Therefore it is imperative that we of the Individualist-Right develop and use the proper words in this virtual cold war. While this has been an ongoing project, beginning the write-up process had two inspirations. One the article Coming soon: Proper Narrative, LLC from JD Rucker . The other from Glenn Beck...
Read more

The partial lock-downs failed to work as advertised. It’s time to end them

The empirical data, as well as antibody studies, show that the partial lockdowns need to be concluded as soon as possible. It’s becoming quite clear that the partial lock-downs are doing far more damage than they are preventing. The case is being easily made to put an end to them. We also need to learn our lesson in not engaging it with the same strategy in the future. Yesterday we presented  the video of the two E.R. Doctors  that made the point that the partial lock-downs aren’t working as advertised and that they are doing more harm than good, along with a Wall Street Journal report that examined the data and came to the same conclusion:  Do Lock-downs Save Many Lives? In Most Places, the Data Say No. We could also cite the column from our own medical expert  Dr. Ted Noel  in his column  I’m tired of SWAG (‘Scientific’ Wild-Assed Guess) directives : There is only one rational approach to take now. Open up America for business. … This ...
Read more