In a stunning rebuke to leftists, Iranian protestors blame their oppressive regime instead of Trump

Iranians are protesting, but they aren't protesting Trump - and the media can't stand it...


Protests erupted all over Iran Saturday night after the regime admitted to shooting down a Ukrainian jetliner by accident, killing all 176 people aboard. What began as a candlelight vigil for the victims, many of which were Iranian, quickly turned into an angry protest. Large number of Iranian security forces in uniform and plain clothes were deployed across the country in an attempt to suppress the protests.

Donald Trump tweeted his support of the protests in English and Farsi.

As reported in the Washington Examiner his tweet was ‘the most liked Persian tweet’ in the history of Twitter:
“To the brave and suffering Iranian people: I have stood with you since the beginning of my presidency and my government will continue to stand with you. We are following your protests closely. Your courage is inspiring,” Trump wrote.
به مردم شجاع و رنج کشیده ایران: من از ابتدای دوره ریاست جمهوریم با شما ایستادهام و دولت من همچنان با شما خواهد ایستاد. ما اعتراضات شما را از نزدیک دنبال می کنیم. شجاعت شما الهام بخش است.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 11, 2020
After just one hour, the tweet had received over 100,000 likes and has since more than doubled that number.
Leftists responded with anger at the president encouraging this outpouring of support for liberty. They attempted to correct Iranians desirous of freedom to blame the president for eliminating a known terrorist, responsible for the deaths of over 600 American servicemen.

The common theme of leftist support of authoritarianism.

Consider the reaction of the national socialist media to this story, along with the brewing crisis in Virginia along with the protests against the government of Hong Kong. We submit it’s not just a case where it’s just a coincidence that the left happens to be on the wrong side of history against the people and the cause of liberty.
These three cases, as well as many others, lay bare the leftist predilection for control. In two of these cases, it’s not that they are in opposition to the people and in favor of an oppressive regime because of President Trump. They are siding with the authoritarians because they are their ‘fellow travelers’ in a desire for control.
Originally published on the NOQ Report

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Liberty Lexicon: Winning the argument with one word, Part I

Framing the argument is a critical aspect of the Individualist-Right winning the virtual cold war with the Collectivist-Left. We are in a war for the soul of the country and for freedom. At present it is a virtual cold war, with the Left is on the offensive using their inherent collectivist mindset to their advantage to try to set the terms of debate. It is critically important to recognize that in every conflict one side will develop new tactics and weapons that will be countered and adopted by the other in order to maintain parity. Such is the case with our present situation with the Collectivist-Left using certain words to their advantage as the weapons of the virtual war. Therefore it is imperative that we of the Individualist-Right develop and use the proper words in this virtual cold war. While this has been an ongoing project, beginning the write-up process had two inspirations. One the article Coming soon: Proper Narrative, LLC from JD Rucker . The other from Glenn Beck...
Read more

The partial lock-downs failed to work as advertised. It’s time to end them

The empirical data, as well as antibody studies, show that the partial lockdowns need to be concluded as soon as possible. It’s becoming quite clear that the partial lock-downs are doing far more damage than they are preventing. The case is being easily made to put an end to them. We also need to learn our lesson in not engaging it with the same strategy in the future. Yesterday we presented  the video of the two E.R. Doctors  that made the point that the partial lock-downs aren’t working as advertised and that they are doing more harm than good, along with a Wall Street Journal report that examined the data and came to the same conclusion:  Do Lock-downs Save Many Lives? In Most Places, the Data Say No. We could also cite the column from our own medical expert  Dr. Ted Noel  in his column  I’m tired of SWAG (‘Scientific’ Wild-Assed Guess) directives : There is only one rational approach to take now. Open up America for business. … This ...
Read more