QR Topic Reference Commonsense Civil Right of Armed Self-Defense
https://noqreport.com/2019/10/01/fbi-murder-violent-crime-declined-2018/
FBI Releases 2018 Crime Statistics
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-releases-2018-crime-statistics
New CPRC Research: How A Botched Study Fooled The World About The U.S. Share Of Mass Public Shootings: U.S. Rate Is Lower Than Global Average
https://crimeresearch.org/2018/08/new-cprc-research-how-a-botched-study-fooled-the-world-about-the-u-s-share-of-mass-public-shootings-u-s-rate-is-lower-than-global-average/
How a Botched Study Fooled the World About the U.S. Share of Mass Public Shootings: U.S. Rate is Lower than Global Average
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3238736
Have we become too paranoid about mass shootings?
https://theconversation.com/have-we-become-too-paranoid-about-mass-shootings-125364
Guns Prevent Thousands of Crimes Every Day, Research Shows
https://fee.org/articles/guns-prevent-thousands-of-crimes-every-day-research-show/
The Uncomfortable Myth Of Mass Shootings In America https://bearingarms.com/tom-k/2019/03/03/uncomfortable-myth-mass-shootings-america/ via @BearingArmsCom
It’s a Myth That the US Leads the World in Mass Shootings
https://stream.org/the-myth-that-the-us-leads-the-world-in-mass-shootings/
Here Are 8 Stubborn Facts on Gun Violence in America https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/here-are-8-stubborn-facts-gun-violence-america via @Heritage @malcolm_john
Here are eight stubborn facts to keep in mind about gun violence in America:
1. Violent crime is down and has been on the decline for decades.
2. The principal public safety concerns with respect to guns are suicides and illegally owned handguns, not mass shootings.
3. A small number of factors significantly increase the likelihood that a person will be a victim of a gun-related homicide.
4. Gun-related murders are carried out by a predictable pool of people.
5. Higher rates of gun ownership are not associated with higher rates of violent crime.
6. There is no clear relationship between strict gun control legislation and homicide or violent crime rates.
7. Legally owned firearms are used for lawful purposes much more often than they are used to commit crimes or suicide.
8. Concealed carry permit holders are not the problem, but they may be part of the solution.
Number of homicides in London climbs to 10-year high
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/dec/31/number-of-homicides-in-london-climbs-to-10-year-high
Over 75 cases of the left calling for gun confiscation – Beto version 2019
https://noqreport.Com/2019/11/19/list-75-cases-left-calling-gun-confiscation-beto-version-2019/
Destroying the lie from the national socialist left that ‘no one is talking about gun confiscation’.
Joy Behar, Robert Francis ‘Beto’ O’Rouke and Representative Eric ‘nukem’ Swawell (D-CA) epitomize the mendacity of the left in demanding gun confiscation while denying that they are demanding gun confiscation. Like many others of the national socialist left, they want to push for their final solution to the liberty problem while still pretending to be ‘liberal’, using all manner of soft sounding synonyms for the taking of the people’s property.
2020 Presidential candidates that have advocated gun confiscation.
[or any synonyms thereof: mandatory buy back etc, virtual confiscation/permission requirements ]
Beto O’Rourke [Actual and virtual confiscation/governmental permission requirements for an unalienable human right]
Cory Booker: Cory’s Plan to End the Gun Violence Epidemic [virtual confiscation/governmental permission requirements for an unalienable human right]
Elizabeth Warren [Actual combined with virtual confiscation/governmental permission requirements for an unalienable human right]
Eric Swalwell [Actual and virtual confiscation/governmental permission requirements for an unalienable human right]
Joe Biden: The Biden plan to end our gun violence epidemic [virtual confiscation/governmental permission requirements for an unalienable human right]
Julián Castro [virtual confiscation/governmental permission requirements for an unalienable human right]
Kamala Harris Would Force Gun Owners To Sell Their Assault Weapons To The Government [Forced compensated confiscation]
Kirsten Gillibrand suggests support for mandatory buyback of assault weapons [Actual confiscation/governmental permission requirements for an unalienable human right].
Pete Buttigieg [virtual confiscation/governmental permission requirements for unalienable human rights].
2019
[NYT] VA Governor Northam “has not ruled out confiscating assault weapons from gun owners.”
Behar Advises 2020 Dems: ‘Don’t Tell…Wait Until You Get Elected Then Take Guns Away’.
Beto O’Rourke claims he hasn’t talked about confiscating guns.
Dr. RaShall Brackney, Chief of the Charlottesville Police Department [Paraphrasing] “Any weapons that can be used to kill people should be banned”
A Peace Plan for a Safer America. [Demands for compensated confiscation as well as virtual confiscation of all guns in addition to a licensing requirement for an unalienable human right].
Iowa state Sen. Claire Celsi dictatorial senator threatens to take guns by force if the gun owner wasn’t “nice” to her.
Vox: Democrats have been discussing the same ideas on guns for 25 years. It’s time to change that. [Virtual and actual gun confiscation, requiring governmental permission for an unalienable human right].
Nate McMurray YEP. I’M COMING FOR YOUR AR15 [Congressional candidate calling for gun confiscation]
La Times: Banning semiautomatic weapons won’t solve America’s gun problem [Detailing why just getting rid of semi-autos won’t be enough]
Illinois State Senator Julie Morrison: “Maybe it’ll just be a confiscation and we won’t have to worry about paying the fine.”
‘Goosebumps’! CNN’s Baldwin, Camerota Cheer Hogg Family, Push Mass Gun Confiscation
Syracuse.Com: 20 years after Columbine: ‘Guns are the problem. Guns need to go.’ (Commentary)
Bernie Sanders: We must follow New Zealand’s lead.. ban the sale and distribution of assault weapons
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: Ban bump stocks, semiautos, & high cap mags designed to kill people
2018
Washington Monthly: A Real Long-Term Solution to Gun Violence [Forced nationalization of the arms industry, compensated confiscation]
Harper’s Bazaar: Why We Need to Ban Assault Rifles
Mother Jones: Ban All Semiautomatic Firearms
stltoday.Com: The gun ban that worked [Virtual gun confiscation – the demand to require governmental permission to possess an unalienable human right]
The Guardian: ‘Why does anyone need a gun?’: Toronto shooting prompts calls for handgun ban
Esquire: Okay, Now I Actually Do Want To Take Your Guns
Ban assault weapons, buy them back, go after resisters: Ex-prosecutor in Congress
Vox: Why an assault weapons ban can’t address America’s gun problem
Emma González [March for our Lives]: Removing the assault and semi-automatic weapons from our Civilian society, instituting thorough background checks and mandatory waiting periods (and raising the buying age and banning the production of high-capacity magazines) are the ways to stop shootings in America.
The Charlotte News: Ban military-style assault weapons for the sake of our children
Vox: What no politician wants to admit about gun control “taking a huge number of guns away from a huge number of gun owners”
NAACP President OPINION: Gun Safety Is about Freedom [Australian style gun confiscation – making gun owners an offer they can’t refuse ]
Maine Voices: Yes, we want to take away your guns
Mercury News – Eugene Robinson Robinson: Arming teachers is absurd — ban military-style assault rifles
The Star: Want to end gun violence Mr. President? Get rid of guns
La Times: No one becomes a mass shooter without a mass-shooting gun
It’s Too Late. You’ve Lost Your Guns.
2017
Splinter news: BAN GUNS
Redhawks Online: Guns must go
Boston Globe: Hand over your weapons
News-Press – USA Today Editorial Board: Renew ban on military-style assault weapons
Dan Pfeiffer: What to Bring to the Gun Fight [national gun registry, Tracking and limiting purchases of ammunition and a national gun buyback program]
Eugene Robinson: Gun control should include buyback program like Australia’s
Washington Post Editorial Board Calls on Trump to Pass Gun Control: ‘End This American Carnage’ [Members of The Washington Post Editorial Board]
The Week: Ban guns
Plan A Magazine: Ban Guns. Amend the Constitution.
(CNN) Sachs: Ban semiautomatic assault weapons and save lives
Prospect magazine: Dear America: it’s time to grow up and ban guns
2016
Huffington Post: Domestic Disarmament, Not ‘Gun Control’
Washington Post – Eugene Robinson: Assault weapons must be banned in America
W. Kamau Bell [CNN]: I want Obama to take away your guns
Huffington post: Can’t We Just Put the Damn Guns Down?
Anderson Cooper: “Speaking only for myself, watching Obama get repeatedly accused of wanting to take people’s guns away makes me sort of wish he’d just do something to earn that accusation. May as well!”
The Daily Beast: President Obama Isn’t Taking People’s Guns—But Maybe He Should.
2015
New Republic: It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.
The New York Times: End the Gun Epidemic in America [First Front Page Editorial In 95 Years] This editorial published on A1 in the Dec. 5 edition of The New York Times. It is the first time an editorial has appeared on the front page since 1920.
The Daily Beast: Yes, They Want to Take Your Guns Away
Hillary Clinton: “In the Australian example, as I recall, that was a buyback program.”…..“I think it would be worth considering doing it on the national level”
Vox: Becoming a gun-free society would be hard. But we should still try.
Daily Kos: Effective Gun Control – A National Semi-Auto Ban
Washington Post: A gun-free society
Obama: “We know that other countries, in response to one mass shooting, have been able to craft laws that almost eliminate mass shootings. Friends of ours, allies of ours — Great Britain, Australia, countries like ours. So we know there are ways to prevent it.”
Tallahassee Democrat – Stop the insanity: Ban guns
2014
Obama: A couple of decades ago, Australia had a mass shooting similar to Columbine or Newtown. And Australia just said, well, that’s it — we’re not seeing that again. And basically imposed very severe, tough gun laws.
La Times: You say gun control doesn’t work? Fine. Let’s ban guns altogether.
2013
Huffington Post: Gun Control? We Need Domestic Disarmament
2012
Daily Kos: How to Ban Guns: A step by step, long term process
Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo: “Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your gun but permit it.”
Detroit Metro Times: Ban all guns, now
Opinionator – New York Times: Why Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough
House Dem: ‘Turn in your guns’
Eugene Robinson: First, Get Rid of the Guns
Economist The gun control that works: no guns
Huffington Post: Get Rid of the Damn Guns
Yes conservatives, we want to take away your guns…
2011
Arizona Daily Star: Reinstate ban on military-style assault weapons
1993
La Times – Taming the Monster: Get Rid of the Guns
Originally published on the NOQ Report
This is how the liberty grabbers exploit other people’s pain for their political gain:
PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE THROUGH EFFECTIVE MESSAGING
HIGH-PROFILE GUN VIOLENCE INCIDENTS
OVERVIEW
#1:DON’T HESITATE TO SPEAK OUT.
The truth is, the most powerful time to communicate is when concern and emotions are running at their peak.
#3:DON’T ASSUME THE FACTS – AND DON’T WAIT FOR THEM
Experience tells us that the specific facts of a high-profile gun incident are revealed over time. If we jump to conclusions about those details, we could find ourselves at odds with reality as events unfold.
So, the smartest thing to do is avoid linking our message and arguments to any one set of partially-revealed facts.
#8:DON’T LET POLICYSPEAK DRAIN THE EMOTION FROM THE MOMENT.
There is often a compelling case to be made for immediate action, pivoting from the emotion of a high-profile incident to calls for legislative action or specific policy changes. Those who seek to make that pivot have to be careful not to drain the emotional power out of the moment. An emotionally-driven conversation about what can be done to prevent incidents such as the one at hand is engaging.
http://gunssavelives.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Gun-ViolenceMessaging-Guide-PDF-1.pdf
Venezuela's Maduro launches civilian disarmament plan
22 September 2014
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has announced he is expanding a plan to disarm civilians.
Speaking on the International Day of Peace, Mr Maduro said his government would invest $47m (£29m) and create 60 new disarmament centres.
According to United Nations figures, Venezuela has the second highest peacetime murder rate in the world after Honduras.
Most of the murders in Venezuela are committed using firearms.
"We are building peace from within, and for that, you need disarmament," the president said at an event in the capital, Caracas.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-29308509
Anything can be a weapon if you hold it correctly'
And anything that can be a Weapon can be used to Assault someone, it's right in the definition:
Definition of WEAPON
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/weapon
1: something (as a club, knife, or gun) used to injure, defeat, or destroy
Assault with a deadly Weapon.
Origin of WEAPON Middle English wepen, from Old English wǣpen; akin to Old High German wāffan weapon, Old Norse vāpn
First Known Use: before 12th century
Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
JUNE 28, 2005
WASHINGTON, June 27 - The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm, even a woman who had obtained a court-issued protective order against a violent husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation.
The decision, with an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia and dissents from Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, overturned a ruling by a federal appeals court in Colorado. The appeals court had permitted a lawsuit to proceed against a Colorado town, Castle Rock, for the failure of the police to respond to a woman's pleas for help after her estranged husband violated a protective order by kidnapping their three young daughters, whom he eventually killed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/justices-rule-police-do-not-have-a-constitutional-duty-to-protect.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PoliceOne Analysis: 12 Supreme Court cases affecting cops
https://www.policeone.com/l...
https://www.policeone.com/legal/articles/1964272-PoliceOne-Analysis-12-Supreme-Court-cases-affecting-cops/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPREME COURT RULING: Police Have No Duty To Protect The General Public
The Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that police officers at all levels of the government have no duty to protect the citizens of this country.
It is the job of police officers to investigate crimes and arrest criminals.
We are on our own for protection.
While we are quite sure most police officers will help someone in need when required, just remember the next time you feel you might need protection that police officers have no duty to provide that to you.
Sources:
– Warren v. District of Columbia
– Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone (NY Times)
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28scotus.html
http://gunssavelives.net/blog/supreme-court-ruling-police-have-no-duty-to-protect-the-general-public/
Bill of Rights
Amendment 1
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment 2
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment 4
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment 5
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment 9
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment 10
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Comments
Post a Comment