Video: Socialism For Democrats Parts 1 & 2



"How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin." Ronald Reagan

These were some talks from a few years ago extolling the wonders of Socialism and communism. Often times it’s is very useful to see what the enemies of freedom are saying: Part 1






Part 2:







Please note that the professor wastes a great deal of time discussing nothing of value with a fair amount of repetition. These are some of the points I’ve been able to extract from these interminable lectures.

He spends the first 10 minutes complaining about the organized evil that is socialism being demonized. Go figure, here we have an ideology that has brutally oppressed billions of people and has murdered 100 million more and intelligent people seem to have a problem with it.

- He sets up a strawman argument of sorts using the Marxist pejorative instead of for the free-market or economic freedom. This is the presumption that those advocated freedom have made some very fanciful promises

- The primary difference between Socialism and Communism is how one reaches the goal of taking over the government. Its’ the difference between evolutionary socialism and revolutionary socialism

- Apparently the goal of socialism is to take over the government and then have it ‘wither away’ with the worker’s in control of the means of production. Except this never seems to happen…

Example: the professor in this series condemns Stalin for not making this step but neglects to do the same with regard to Lenin who had ten years to accomplish the goal and did not.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Liberty Lexicon: Winning the argument with one word, Part I

Framing the argument is a critical aspect of the Individualist-Right winning the virtual cold war with the Collectivist-Left. We are in a war for the soul of the country and for freedom. At present it is a virtual cold war, with the Left is on the offensive using their inherent collectivist mindset to their advantage to try to set the terms of debate. It is critically important to recognize that in every conflict one side will develop new tactics and weapons that will be countered and adopted by the other in order to maintain parity. Such is the case with our present situation with the Collectivist-Left using certain words to their advantage as the weapons of the virtual war. Therefore it is imperative that we of the Individualist-Right develop and use the proper words in this virtual cold war. While this has been an ongoing project, beginning the write-up process had two inspirations. One the article Coming soon: Proper Narrative, LLC from JD Rucker . The other from Glenn Beck...
Read more

The partial lock-downs failed to work as advertised. It’s time to end them

The empirical data, as well as antibody studies, show that the partial lockdowns need to be concluded as soon as possible. It’s becoming quite clear that the partial lock-downs are doing far more damage than they are preventing. The case is being easily made to put an end to them. We also need to learn our lesson in not engaging it with the same strategy in the future. Yesterday we presented  the video of the two E.R. Doctors  that made the point that the partial lock-downs aren’t working as advertised and that they are doing more harm than good, along with a Wall Street Journal report that examined the data and came to the same conclusion:  Do Lock-downs Save Many Lives? In Most Places, the Data Say No. We could also cite the column from our own medical expert  Dr. Ted Noel  in his column  I’m tired of SWAG (‘Scientific’ Wild-Assed Guess) directives : There is only one rational approach to take now. Open up America for business. … This ...
Read more

Winning the War of Words: The Authoritarian Socialist Left Is Anti-Liberty and Not Just Anti-Gun

  Anti-liberty Leftists have an unhinged view that certain inanimate objects are evil and dangerous, so when the debate is framed as pro-gun/anti-gun, the subliminal argument becomes pro-evil/anti-evil   Conservatism ,  Culture ,  Democrats ,  Guns and Crime ,  Leftism ,  Neo-Marxism   Many of the pro-freedom community don’t realize that we place ourselves at a severe disadvantage when the debate over civil rights is framed as  ‘pro-gun/anti-gun’ . Since our principles of liberty and individual rights are based in common sense, their defense is pretty straightforward and forthright. Not so with the authoritarians of the anti-liberty left. These are people who prioritize governmental power and controlling people’s lives and property – if not owning it outright. Such people have always been on the wrong side of history, so deception and lies are all part of what they do on a daily basis. “Those who are capable of tyranny are capable of perjury ...
Read more